Course Syllabus

USING COMPUTERS TO IMPROVE INSTRUCTION IN THE CLASSROOM

MARSHALL UNIVERSITY

 

COURSE NUMBER: CI 660

 

TITLE:        Using Computers to Improve Instruction in the

Classroom

 

INSTRUCTOR:   Dr. Carl S. Johnson

              Professor & Chair, School of Education

              204 Jenkins Hall

             Phone (304) 696-2872

             Email: johnson@marshall.edu

             Home Page: http://webpages.marshall.edu/~johnson

 

CREDIT:       Three semester hours

 

TEXT:         Technology in the Classroom,2005/06, Johnson,

Carl S.

             

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

 

     This course is designed primarily for public and private school teachers who possess reasonably good computer skills. 

 

COURSE OBJECTIVES:

 

     The major objectives of this course are to provide students with experiences and skill development in:

1.  Applying productivity tools for creating multimedia presentations.

2.  Using computers to support problem solving, data collection, information management, communications, and decision making.

3.  Observing demonstrations or use of broadcast instruction, audio/video conferencing, and other distance learning applications.

4.  Research and use of technology in specific content areas.

5.  Creating a set of subject related bookmarks on the internet.

6.  Using electronic mail and web browser applications to support specific curriculum objectives.

7.  Using productivity tools to improve teaching and learning in the content areas.

8.  Identifying, selecting and integrating video and other varying forms of communications technology to improve learning in the content areas.

9.  Participating in collaborative projects and team activities using appropriate technologies.

10. Demonstration in the use of technology resources in specific curriculum areas that support instruction for students with special needs.

11. Exploring, evaluating, and using computer/technology resources including applications, tools, educational software and associated documentation.

12. Practicing responsible, ethical and legal use of technology, information, and software resources.

 

GRADING:

 

     Proficient completion (as determined by the instructor) of the following ten items will be sufficient to obtain a grade of A:

1.  Become proficient at using PowerPoint.  Students will make a presentation demonstrating various features of Power Point. The Power Point presentation will be burned to a CD and must contain your voice recorded on at least one slide, 3-D headings, scanned photographs, graphics – some created on your own and some copied from the internet, automatic timing on at least three slides, music playing on at least three slides, hyperlinks to other Power Point presentations, hyperlinks to your Web page and other Web pages, hyperlinks to other slides, hyperlinks to videos – some created by you and some from the internet, text appearing on the screen in a variety of ways – a letter at a time, a word at a time, a whole paragraph at a time, and include various sounds from the internet – you may want to try – http://www.a1freesoundeffects.com/cartoon.html. 

 

A copy of the CD will be given to the instructor and he will keep it on file.

2.  Create a Home Page and then add a page for bookmarks with a minimum of 50 bookmarks in one or more content area(s).  Some of the bookmarks may be placed under a heading of “Miscellaneous.”

3.  Develop a resume’ and place it on your Home Page.

4.  Develop a Family Page and place it on your Home Page.

5.  Summarize (must be typed) and discuss six technology related articles.  At least one of the articles must be related to instruction for students with special needs.  You will discuss the articles in class.

6.  You are to research a minimum of 10 search engines and summarize what you find about each search engine.

7.  Become familiar with using a word processing program, a data base program, and a spreadsheet program.

 

The word processing assignment must contain the following features: columns, horizontal and vertical lines, headers/footers, drop cap letters, different font sizes, page numbering, textart/wordart, subscripts, superscripts, bullets and special characters.

8.   Complete a Newsletter for a school/organization.

9.   Complete a Brochure for a school/organization.

10.  Become proficient at using the digital camera and the

scanner.  This includes taking a digital picture and placing it on your homepage and inserting pictures into a Power Point presentation.

     Students who do not receive a proficient grade on any of the 10 items above will be given one chance to remediate their work to a proficient level.  Any student who is not able to remediate their work on the first try will receive a grade of B or C – depending upon the quality of the remediated work.  A grade of C will be given to students who are not able to remediate their work on the second attempt.


 

    

References

 

Alessi, S., & Trollip, S. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development. Needham

 Heights, MA:Allyn and Bacon.

Alley, L., & Jansek, K. (2001). The ten keys to quality assurance and assessment in online

 learning. Journal of Interactive Instructional Development, 13(3), 3-18.

Anderson, C. L., & Anderson, K. M. (2001). Using software to help visualize mathematical

 processes. Special Education Technology Practice, 3(2), 13-18.

Arnett, P. (2000). Mastering reading and writing with technology. Media & Methods, 37(1), 12-14.

Becker, H. J. (2000). Internet use by teachers. The Jossey-Bass Reader on Technology and

 Learning.  San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Becker, H. J. (2001, April). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Paper presented at

 the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA. Retrieved July 8,

 2003 from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/FINDINGS/special3?

Bringsjord, S. (2001). Just imagine: What computers can’t do. The Education Digest, 66(6), 31-33.

Bull,G, Bull, G, & Bull S. (2000). Java applets. Learning and Leading with Technology, 27(8), 42-

45.

Bull, G., Bull, G., & Whitaker, S. (2001). Web clippings. Learning and Leading with Technology,

 28(5), 54-57.

Campbell, D. (2000).  Authentic assessment and authentic standards. Phi Delta Kappan, 81,405-407.

Canfield, W. (2001). ALEKS:A web-based intelligent tutoring system. Mathematics and Computer

 Education, 35(2), 152-159.

Carnavale, D., & Yoiung, J (2001, July 13). Telecourses change channels.  The Chronicle of Higher

 Education. Available online: http://chronicle.com/weekly/v47/i44/44a02901.htm.

Carr, S. (2001, July 13). PBS sticks to its strategy for telecourses. Unafraid of competition

 from the Internet. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Available online:

 http://chronicle.com/weekly/v47/i44/44a03102.htm.

Chenau, J. (2000). Cyber traveling through the Loire Valley. Learning and Leading with

 Technology, 28(2), 22-27.

Christle, C. A., Hess, J. M., & Hasselbring, T. S. (2001). Technology research in practice:

 Taking a virtual trip to the mall to learn math. Special Education Technology Practice, 3(2),

 23-31.

Clark, T. (2001, October). Virtual schools: Trends and issues. Report commissioned by the

 Distance Learning Resource Network, a WestEd Project, Co-sponsored by the Centre for the

 Application of Information Technologies at Western Illinois University.  Available oneline:

 http://www.dlrn.org/trends.html.

Cochran, P. S. (2000) Technology for individuals with speech and language disorders. In J. D.

 Lindsey (Ed.), Technology and exceptional individuals (3rd ed. Pp. 303-325). Austin, TX:ProEd.

Cordes, C., & Miller, E. (2000). Fool’s gold: A critical look at computers in childhood.  College

 Park, MD: Alliance for Childhood.

Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused. Boston:Harvard University Press.

Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high

 school classroom: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4),

 813-834.

Dabbagh, N. (2001). Concept mapping as a mindtool for critical thinking. Journal of Computing in

 Teacher Education, 17(2), 16-23.

Denby, D. (2000, Nobember 27). The speed of light:The high stakes race to build the next

 Internet.  The New Yorker, 133-141.

Digest of educational statistics (2001). [On-line].  Available:

 http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/digest2001/ch7.asp

Dominick, J. (2000). Wireless on campus. Syllabus, 14(4), 19-22.

Durden, W. (2001, October 19). Liberal arts for all, not just the rich. Chronicle of Higher

 Education, Available online: http://chronicle.com.

Educational Software Preview Guide Consortium (2000). Educational software preview guide.

  Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

Edyburn, D. L. (2001). Technology integration strategies:Universal design and technology

 integration, finding the connections. Closing the Gap, 20(1), 21-22.

Elin, L. (2001). Designing and developing multimedia. Boston:Allyn & Bacon.

Ettenheim, S., Furger, R., Siegman, L., & McLester, S. (2000). Tips for getting girls involved.

 Technology & Learning 20(8), 34-36.

Gardiner. S.(2001). Cybercheating: A new twist on an old problem. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(2), 172-

176.

Harris, J. (2000). Taboo topic no longer: Why telecollaborative projects sometimes fail.

  Learning and Leading with Technology, 27(5), 36-41.

Hartley, K. (2000). Online simulation. Learning and Leading with Technology, 28(3), 32-35.

Heinich, R, Molenda, M., Russell, J., & Smaldino, S. (2000). Instructional media and technologies

 for learningUpper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Henderson, L., Klemes, J., & Eshet, Y. (2000). Just playing a game? Educational simulation

 software and cognitive outcomes.  Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(1), 1050129.

Hoffer, C. R. (2001). Teaching music in secondary schools. Belmont, CA:Wadsworth/Thomson

 Learning.

Howard, R. (2001, November 16). Forget about policing plagiarism – just teach. Chronicle of

 Higher Education. Available online: http://chronicle.com.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). National educational technology

 standards.  Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

Johnson, J. M. (2001). 2001 educational software preview guide. Eugene, OR:ISTE.

Knee, R. Musgrove, A., and Musgrove, J. (2000). Lights, camera, action: Streaming video on your

 web site. Learning and Leading with Technology, 28(1), 50-53.

Lewis, P. (2001). Spreadsheet magic:Forty lessons using spreadsheets to teach curriculum in K-8

 classrooms. Eugene, OR:ISTE.

Lim, C. (2001). Computer self-efficacy, academic self-concept, and other predictors of

 satisfaction and future participation of adult distance learners.  The American Journal of

 Distance Education, 15(2), 41-52.

Lockard, J., & Abrams, P., (2001). Computers for twenty-first century educators (5th ed.). New

 York:Longman.

Lopez, S. (2000). Cat in the hat and all that. Time Magazine, 156(17),6.

Loupe, D. (2001). Virtual schooling. eSchool News, 4(6), 41-47.

Lowther, D. L., Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (2003).  The laptop classroom: The effect on

 instruction and achievement.  Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 51, 23-44.

Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA:The

 MIT Press.

McCullen, C. (2001). Going the distance…with technology. Technology & Learning, 21(7), 45-47.

McNabb, M. (2001). In search of appropriate usage guidelines.  Learning and Leading with

 Technolog, 29(2),50-54.

Microsoft Word Thesaurus (2003). Microsoft Corporation.

Miller, S.E. (2001). Technology:What’s it good for? Learning and Leading with Technology, 28(6),

 42-45.

Mills, S., & Roblyer, M.D. (2003). Technology tools for teachers: A Microsoft Office Tutorial.

 Columbus, OH:Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Mitchell, K., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2001). Risk factors for and impact of online sexual

 solicitation of yough. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(23), 3011-3014.

Morrison, G.R., Ross, S.M., & Kemp, J. E. (2004). Designing effective instruction (4th ed.). New

 York:John Wiley.

National Center for Educational Statistics [NCES]. (2002). Internet access in public schools and

 classrooms: 1994-2001. Retrieved August 9, 2003,from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/internet/3.asp.

NETS (2000). National Educational Technology Standards for Students: Connecting curriculum and

 technology. Eugene, OR: International Society For Technology in Education in cooperation with

 the U.S. Department of Education.

Ormrod, J. E. (2000). Educational psychology: Developing learners (3rd. ed.). Upper Saddle River,

 NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Osborn, V. (2001) Identifying at-risk students in videoconferencing and web-based distance

 education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 41-54.

Parmenter, B., & Burns, M. (2001). GIS in the classroom: Challeges, opportunities and

 alternatives. Learning and Leading with Technology, 28(7), 10-16.

Poftak, A. (2001). Getting a read on e-books. Technology & Learning, 21(9), 22-36.

Reissman, R. (2000). Priceless gifts. Learning and Leading with Technology, 28(2), 28-31.

Reissman, R., & Gil, E. (2000). Technology takes on fairy tales and folktales.  Learning and

 Leading with Technology, 27(5), 18-21.

Renne, C. (2000). Taking shape:Linking geometry and technology. Learning and Leading with

 Technology, 27(7), 58-62.

Rifkin, J. (2000). The age of access. New York:Tarcher/Pubnam.

Roblyer, M. D. (2000). Digital desperation: Research reports on a growing technology and equity

 crisis. Learning and Leading with Technology, 27(8), 50-53.61.

Roblyer, M. D. (2002). Virtual high schools in the U.S. – Current views, future visions. In J.

 Bradley (Ed.), The open classroom, Distance learning in schools. London:Kogan Page Publishing

 Company.

Roblyer, M. D., & Ekhaml, L. (2000). How interactive are your distance courses? A rubric for

 assessing interactivity in distance learning.  Online Journal of Distance Learning

 Administration, 3(2). Available online: http://www.westga.edu/~distance/summer32.htm.

Shields, M., & Berman, R. (2000). Children and computer technology: Analysis and recommendations.

 The Future of Children, 10(2). Available online: http://www.futureofchildren.org/cct/index.htm.

Simpson, C. M. (2001). Copyright for schools: A practical guide (2nd ed.) Worthington, OH:Linworth

 Publishing, Inc.

Soloman, G. (2001). Deconstructing a grant. Technology & Learning, 21(11), 44-52.

Steinburg, R., & Oberem, G. (2000). Research-based instructional software in modern physics.

 Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 19(2), 115-136.

Sun, J. (2000). How do we know it’s working? Learning and Leading with Technology, 27(7), 32-35,

 41, 49.

The American heritage dictionary of the English language, 4th ed.Boston:Houghton Mifflin, 2000,

 Available:www.bartleby.com/61/.

Trend, D. (2001). Welcome to cyberschool. Lanham, MD:Rowman and Littlefield.

Truett, C. (2001). Sherlock Holmes on the Internet:Language arts teams up with the computing

 librarian, Learning and Leading with Technology, 29(2), 36-41.

U.S. Bureau of the Census (May, 2001). Profiles of general demographic characteristics [Online].

  Available:

 http://www2.census.gov/census_2000/datasets/demographic_profile/0_United_States/2kh00.pdf.

Walsh, T. (2001), SAMDADs for your classroom, Learning and Leading with Technology, 28(6), 32-35,

 60.

Wang, A., & Newlin, M. (2000). Characteristics of students who enroll and succeed in web-based

 classesJournal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 137-143.

Wired Digital Inc. (2001, April 2). Are teachers using the net? Available online:

 http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,42658,00.html.

Young, B. (2000). Gender differences in student attitudes towards computers.  Journal of Research

 on Computing in Education, 33(2), 204-213.

Young, J. (2001, July 6). The cat-and-mouse game of plagiarism detection. Chronicle of Higher

 Education. Available online: http://chronicle.com.

Zakon, R. H. (2003). Hobbes’ Internet timeline v6.1. Retrieved August 1, 2003, from

 http://www.zakon.org/robert/internet/timeline/#2000s.

Zisow, M. A. (2001). Fundraising with technology. Learning and Leading with Technology, 28(4),

 36-41.

Revised - Fall, 2005